Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 03:45
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Is an apple a day really good for your health? - BBC
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Mariska Hargitay will reveal past secrets, new family at 'My Mom Jayne' premiere - USA Today
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
10-year Treasury yield eases after May core inflation is less than expected - CNBC
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Is there a way to use men’s hair gel that doesn’t make your hair dry and crunchy?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What do you think hell is like?
Thank you.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
June's full 'Strawberry Moon' illuminates the night sky next week: Here's how to see it - Space
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Report: Packers taking full dead cap hit of $17 million on Jaire Alexander in 2025 - NBC Sports
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
OpenAI’s first AI device with Jony Ive won’t be a wearable - The Verge